arXiv preprint ·
Learned Bow Control on a Measured Bowed-String Model: a Revised Minimum-Bow-Force Law, a Recurrent Controller, and the Domain of a Supervision Ceiling
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A finite-difference bowed-string model with implicitly resolved Stribeck friction is presented, with a regime diagnostic, the Schelleng bow-force limits on four strings, and a comparison of learned bow controllers. Implicit resolution is necessary, and quantitatively so: a lagged contact force cannot capture the string on a discrete grid, so no stick phase forms at any bow force. With friction, impedance and quality factor taken from published measurement rather than fitted, all four strings return a stick fraction of 89.1% against an ideal 90%. Schelleng's maximum bow force is recovered on every string. The minimum is not: it follows $Z v_b β^{-1}$ rather than the predicted $Z^2 v_b β^{-2}$, reducing both squared dependences to first powers. Six controllers at matched capacity, over four strings and twenty seeds each, place a gated recurrent network ahead of a feedforward one, by most under a mid-stroke disturbance. The feedforward network completes more strokes only from a start the model's own playability map places outside the Helmholtz region. A minimal gated variant fails because gates computed from the input alone cannot clear a latched state. Training loss selects neither the capacity nor the context length, and no learned controller improves on the lookup rule that generated its labels. That bound has a domain. Regressing the controller's score on the rule's gives a slope of 0.32, more than ten standard errors below unity, so the controller overtakes the rule where the rule fails and is bounded by it where it holds. Under a rigid finger stop the plant is provably invariant, so transfer loss between pitches belongs to the controller alone and is traced to one feature. A regime classifier without a stick test labels small-amplitude periodic slipping as Helmholtz motion, and a harmonicity measure rates a string the bow never grips above Helmholtz motion.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Audio & Speech Processing
CAL-MOS: Bridging Layers with Adapters for Robust MOS Prediction Across Speech Foundation Models
Language Orthogonalization for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Audio Deepfake Detection
Encoder Awakening via Adapters: Effective Domain-Adaptive Fine-tuning of Speech-LLMs
Typhoon ASR Streaming: Steerable Low-Latency Thai Speech Recognition with Real-Time Shallow Fusion
SG-Mamba: Sparse Graph-Guided Mamba for Audio-Visual Speech Enhancement
Get the few papers worth your time in Audio & Speech Processing every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.