arXiv preprint ·
MARC: Morphology-Aware Regression of Consensus for Cell Segmentation in Subcellular Spatial Transcriptomics
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Accurate cell segmentation remains a major bottleneck in subcellular spatial transcriptomics (SST), in which morphological images and spatially resolved RNA transcripts are used to partition tissues into individual cellular instances. As segmentation serves as the foundation for constructing cell-level representations, boundary errors can lead to incorrect transcript assignments and compromise downstream analyses. However, reliable ground-truth boundaries are unavailable because they must be inferred from incomplete morphological and transcript signals. Furthermore, manual annotation of a large number of cells is time-consuming. Agreement among complementary segmentation methods provides a practical surrogate for identifying well-supported and ambiguous regions, but explicit consensus construction requires executing multiple computationally intensive pipelines. In this study, we propose MARC (Morphology-Aware Regression of Consensus), a framework that predicts a multi-method consensus-support map for SST segmentation. MARC is trained with leave-one-method-out consensus pseudo-targets and a Foreground-Union Consensus Loss that focuses supervision on candidate and consensus foreground. We evaluated MARC on 4,642 held-out tiles from Xenium kidney tissue, achieving a mean Dice score of 0.90, a mean intersection-over-union of 0.82, and a mean cell-level Spearman correlation of 0.79 against explicitly computed cross-method consensus maps. We demonstrate that the predicted consensus maps localise weakly supported regions while preserving consensus-based rankings and identifying low-consensus cells for manual review. These results show that MARC closely approximates explicit cross-method consensus without multi-method inference and therefore has the potential to facilitate robust, consensus-aware evaluation of cell segmentation in large-scale SST studies.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
ChatGPT Images 2.5 on Forgery Tasks: Testing Advertised Improvements Against Known Answers
Task-Specified Active Metrological Inspection with Measurement-Steered VLA Manipulation and Deterministic Evidence Gating
YOLO12-MambaScan: An Efficient Object Detector with High-Frequency Enhancement and State-Space Modeling
What Input Resolution Is Required for Bird Species Identification, and What Is Its Latency Cost on an Edge Device? A Study of 14 Input Resolutions and Six Architectures with On-Device Measurements
Compositional Shift Algebra: Extrapolating Mixed Robot Shifts Without Mixed Finetuning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.