arXiv preprint ·
ChatGPT Images 2.5 on Forgery Tasks: Testing Advertised Improvements Against Known Answers
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
OpenAI released ChatGPT Images 2.5 on 8 September 2026, advertising more precise local edits, better consistency across edits, more faithful reference products and sharper detail. We evaluate these claims on four forgery tasks with answers fixed in advance: receipt-field alteration, repeated editing, product placement and small-print rendering. GPT-Image-2 provides same-week baselines at a cheaper and a more expensive tier. A limited improvement appears in receipt editing. After alignment, OCR detects changes to surrounding text in 31.7% of Flare outputs, against 44.2% for the cheaper baseline. This gain is concentrated on CORD receipts and sensitive to shifts of a pixel or less; the forged value itself is no more often correct. Repeated editing and fine print show no measurable gain. Product codes become more legible mainly because Images 2.5 draws the product larger. Defence outcomes change little: localisation remains weak for both generations. A detector that flags 68.6% of controlled benchmark images flags only 35.9% of images posted online. Advertised improvements therefore transfer unevenly to the tested forgery capabilities, while substantial detection limitations remain.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Task-Specified Active Metrological Inspection with Measurement-Steered VLA Manipulation and Deterministic Evidence Gating
YOLO12-MambaScan: An Efficient Object Detector with High-Frequency Enhancement and State-Space Modeling
What Input Resolution Is Required for Bird Species Identification, and What Is Its Latency Cost on an Edge Device? A Study of 14 Input Resolutions and Six Architectures with On-Device Measurements
Compositional Shift Algebra: Extrapolating Mixed Robot Shifts Without Mixed Finetuning
SPARK: Representation-Level KV Memory Alignment for Safer Vision-Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.