arXiv preprint ·
Learning Sign Language Recognition under Label Noise: A Study of Noise-Robust Losses for Isolated and Continuous Settings
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In sign language recognition, the isolated (ISLR) classification loss treats a single label as ground truth, as does the frame-level auxiliary classifier over pseudo-labels we add to continuous (CSLR) methods, which lack one. Stylistic variation blurs ISLR annotation and the lack of temporal boundaries in CSLR forces pseudo-labels; both are noisy. We therefore apply symmetric and generalized cross entropy (SCE, GCE), robust alternatives to cross entropy (CE) from image classification, not to connectionist temporal classification but to the preceding single-label classifier. On ASL Citizen with injected symmetric noise on three backbones (three seeds for ST-GCN), robust losses cost at most 2.5 pt when labels are clean and beat CE by 2.9-10.0 pt in all six conditions at noise rate 0.2, one of which only after q was re-selected on dev. GCE gains more, but its optimal q does not transfer across backbones, whereas one SCE setting works in all nine conditions; both vary 2-11 times more than CE across runs, so a favorable point estimate does not establish stability. For CSLR (PHOENIX-2014) we report no gain; our frame-level targets carry a systematic assignment bias, making that study a diagnosis of a single configuration. At lambda_aux = 25 the pseudo-label CE auxiliary raises word error rate above the no-auxiliary baseline on VAC, CorrNet and SlowFastSign, and GCE/SCE improve on CE by 1.7-3.2 pt (three of six conditions return below that baseline). However, the three losses differ by more than an order of magnitude in effective gradient at a common lambda_aux: matching the initial gradient shrinks the gap to 0.4-0.9 pt, and lowering the CE weight alone already beats that baseline, so neither the degradation nor the improvement can be separated from the effect of the weight. We use only symmetric noise; multi-seed evaluation covers only ST-GCN and VAC isolated.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
UniMo: Unifying Human and Animal Motion Generation
ChatGPT Images 2.5 on Forgery Tasks: Testing Advertised Improvements Against Known Answers
VS-Splat: Voxel-Selective feed-forward Gaussian Splatting for end-to-end 3D object reconstruction from sparse-views
YOLO12-MambaScan: An Efficient Object Detector with High-Frequency Enhancement and State-Space Modeling
EgoMaize: A First-Person Maize Instance Segmentation Benchmark under Severe Field Occlusion
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.