arXiv preprint ·
Creating an Atomic User Model for Personality-Aware Large Language Model Interaction
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Assistants built on large language models are expected to write in their users' own voice. Most systems summarise the user's preferences and include the summary in the prompt. This is the wrong way round. Preferences are only the surface of a person and change with the task, while the underlying personality stays the same, so storing preferences alone means relearning the user afresh whenever the task changes. This paper makes four contributions. First, we describe an effect we call personality seepage: the wording of a prompt carries traces of the writer's personality, which the assistant copies without knowing the writer. Second, we propose the Atomic User Model (AUM), a readable profile with a stable identity core surrounded by four layers covering psychological, cognitive, experiential, behavioral, and social details, plus notes on inner conflict and authenticity. Third, instead of inserting the entire profile, we use AUM as a searchable index, in which a task classifier, a selection step, and a budgeted retriever pass along only a few relevant fields. Fourth, we test the pipeline with 16 simulated users, 6 style-sensitive tasks, and 3 seeds. Eight retrieved fields matched the writing quality of the whole profile, while using only 23 percent of the context (211 tokens instead of 915). They scored 0.24 points higher than a plain preference note on a five-point scale. Accuracy in picking a user's own writing from four samples rose from 14.9 to 42.7 percent, where guessing gives 25 percent. Four pre-registered controls showed no effect, so the gain comes from the profile's structure rather than the search method. Personalization helps most for the users for whom a generic assistant imitates them the worst.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Evaluating Scaffolding-Oriented Multi-Agent Large Language Model System for Clinical Interview Training
LatentVerse: A Framework for Understanding Shared and Modality-Specific Information in Multimodal Latent Representations
How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding
Context-Aware Causal Gaze Forecasting for Human-Vehicle Interaction During In-Cabin Tracking Dropouts
(Whose defaults?) Is artificial intelligence reorienting archaeological methods?
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.