arXiv preprint ·
ARNAI: Artifact Removal Network based on Autoencoding and Inpainting for Robust Spinal Image Segmentation and Measurement
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
This study aims to develop an AI framework applicable for postoperative imaging for automated measurement of spinopelvic parameters on radiographs with robustness to the presence of spinal implants. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed lateral lumbar spine radiographs from two institutions (Internal: January 2017--December 2024; External: October 2021--September 2025). We developed the Restore, Segment, and Measure (RSM) framework, incorporating a novel Artifact Removal Network based on Autoencoding and Inpainting (ARNAI) to mitigate implant-related artifacts in postoperative radiographs. Segmentation and spinopelvic parameter (PT, LL, SS, SCA) measurement performance were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: When ARNAI was added to a recent Transformer-based segmentation model, FCBFormer, the mean DSC increased to 0.870 from 0.814, with marked gains at L3--L5 and smaller improvements at L1--L2. On 91 radiographs with implants, the mean L4--L5 segmental Cobb angle error decreased to 4.7 ° from 15.6--16.2 °, an average error reduction of 70%. The ICC for L4--L5 segmental Cobb angle improved to 0.54 (Rater 1) and 0.59 (Rater 2) from 0.18, and ICCs for pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, and sacral slope all exceeded 0.70. The improvement in L4--L5 segmental Cobb angle error was statistically significant in the internal implant-containing cohort after correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusion: The proposed RSM framework improved automated spinopelvic parameter measurement in implant-containing postoperative radiographs. By mitigating implant-related artifacts, ARNAI improved segmentation and downstream measurement accuracy, with the greatest benefit observed for L4--L5 segmental Cobb angle estimation, where the mean error was reduced by approximately 70%.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Contextual Observer Grounding: Evaluating Situated Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
BrachistoneLR: A Brachistochrone-Inspired Learning-Rate Schedule and a Controlled Benchmark of Scheduling Policies
BEFORE THE FLIP: Measuring Hidden Score Shifts In Quantized Vision Language Models Before The Answer Changes for Visual Question Answering
VI-Bench: Benchmarking Prompt Inversion from AIGC Videos
Emo-DVS: A Multimodal Benchmark for Privacy-Aware Emotion Recognition with Event Cameras
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.