arXiv preprint ·
BrachistoneLR: A Brachistochrone-Inspired Learning-Rate Schedule and a Controlled Benchmark of Scheduling Policies
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The learning-rate schedule is a consequential choice in training deep networks, yet the policies in common use are heuristic, and published comparisons are hard to read, because architecture, dataset, and budget tend to vary alongside the schedule. We study BrachistoneLR, a schedule built by mapping the vertical coordinate of the brachistochrone, the curve of fastest descent under gravity, onto the range between a peak and a floor rate. Expanding the definition shows it to be cosine annealing with the half-period set to E - 1 instead of E, the configuration a standard implementation gives when its period argument is one less than the number of epochs. The rate therefore reaches its floor at the last epoch trained rather than one epoch later, and we show this difference decays as E^-2, making it a short-horizon effect. We then benchmark six schedules over 72 runs on three image classification datasets (MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10) and four architecture families (fully connected, convolutional, recurrent, residual), fixing the optimizer, data pipeline, and evaluation protocol so that only the schedule varies. Schedules that fall smoothly from peak to floor beat the constant rate and calendar-based decay by margins that grow with task difficulty, reaching 2.5 points of dataset mean on CIFAR-10. Within that leading group, BrachistoneLR, cosine annealing, and warmup-cosine lie within 0.06 accuracy points and 0.17 of a mean rank, which one seed per configuration cannot separate. BrachistoneLR is best on both residual networks and has the highest CIFAR-10 mean, and it sets no milestones, decay factor, warmup length, or restart period. We conclude that the shape of a schedule matters more than its parameterization, that the choice of whether to use a smooth schedule matters more than the choice among them, and that the terminal-rate distinction is worth attention only over short horizons.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Myocardial Strain Drift Correction in Deep Learning Based Ultrasound Tracking
VI-Bench: Benchmarking Prompt Inversion from AIGC Videos
RouteBridge: Reliability-Routed Bidirectional Distillation Between Neural Radiance Fields and 3D Gaussian Splatting
Marigold V2: Revisiting Diffusion Transformers for Monocular Depth Estimation
Marker-free eye-gaze estimation using a single image and depth from defocus
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.