OpenAlex ·

Predictable Accuracy of Martini 3 Absolute Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies across 15 Targets

Luis J. Walter and Tristan Bereau

Published
Source
OpenAlex
Published in
arXiv (Cornell University)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2610.11714
Original
Read it at the publisher
Topics
ChemistryComputational ComplexityMolecular Networks

Abstract

Alchemical free-energy calculations predict protein-ligand binding affinities with close-to-experimental accuracy, but their cost restricts them to small sets of ligands. Coarse-grained (CG) models such as Martini 3 retain a rigorous statistical-mechanical treatment at a fraction of this cost, yet their accuracy for protein-ligand binding has not been assessed systematically. Here, we compute absolute binding free energies for 172 ligands across 15 protein targets with a Martini 3 double-decoupling protocol and compare them against atomistic FEP+ and OpenFE references. Martini underbinds for every target, by 2.7 to 8.7 kcal/mol. This offset is systematic: it comprises a uniform contribution that grows with the number of charged pocket residues. A linear model in this number, which requires only the protein structure, reduces the mean absolute error from 5.7 to 1.2 kcal/mol in leave-one-out cross-validation, close to the 1.0 kcal/mol obtained with exact per-target offsets. The ranking of ligands within a target varies more widely (median Spearman $ρ$ of 0.32, from $-$0.41 to 0.89) and is rationalized by the structure-activity relationship of each series: Martini ranks ligands well when their affinity is driven by hydrophobicity, $π$-stacking, or size, and poorly when it is driven by hydrogen bonding or charge. Both trends follow from Martini's calibration against bulk partitioning, which captures neither the dielectric environment of a binding pocket nor the directionality of hydrogen bonds. While MMGBSA retains the atomistic detail needed to rank congeneric ligands, Martini yields physically meaningful free energies, and its coarse-graining maps many atomistically distinct molecules onto one representation, making it a complementary tool for rapidly spanning chemical space.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Chemistry

Get the few papers worth your time in Chemistry every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics