OpenAlex ·

The 2024 MRSI Data Processing and Quantification Challenge Synthetic Dataset

John LaMaster, Julian P. Merkofer, Dennis van de Sande, Brian J. Soher, Bernhard Strasser and Chao Ma

Published
Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2609.02637
Original
Read it at the publisher
Topics
Radiology & ImagingMolecular Networks

Abstract

Synthetic data is central to magnetic resonance spectroscopy method development because they provide ground truths for software validation, reproducible benchmarking, and machine- and deep-learning training. In MRSI, synthetic data must capture spatially varying anatomy, field inhomogeneity, nuisance signals, and measurement effects. The 2024 MRSI Data Processing and Quantification Challenge Synthetic Dataset is a simulated 3T brain FID-MRSI resource with ground-truth metabolite maps developed as a controlled testbed for MRSI processing and quantification methods. Subject-specific simulations used anatomical images and field maps from Human Connectome Project subjects. Tissue masks, quantum-mechanically simulated metabolite basis functions, in vivo-derived macromolecular components, Bloch-simulated post-WET residual water, registered in vivo lipid signals, spectral baseline, $B_0$-dependent frequency shifts, Voigt lineshape variations, and complex Gaussian noise were combined in a forward model. Water and lipid signals were synthesized on a high-resolution grid and Fourier-truncated to the final echo-planar spectroscopic imaging grid to model the finite spatial point spread function. This resource has 24 training and 8 testing datasets containing contaminated FID-MRSI data, anatomical images, $B_0$ maps, metadata, and ground-truth metabolite and component signals. Forward-model parameters are documented, including tissue-specific metabolite concentrations and relaxation times, macromolecular amplitude ratios, the water model, noise, and field-inhomogeneity ranges. This synthetic benchmark supports development and comparison of MRSI processing, nuisance-signal removal, and metabolite-quantification methods, while enabling method evaluation. It illustrates how characterized synthetic data can support rigorous evaluation when ground truth is difficult or impossible to obtain.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Radiology & Imaging

Get the few papers worth your time in Radiology & Imaging every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics