OpenAlex ·
Spec-Driven Development for Agentic Software Engineering: Harnessing Human-Agent Teamwork
- Published
- Source
- OpenAlex
- Published in
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2609.00252
- Original
- Read it at the publisher
- Topics
Abstract
Software engineering is moving from AI-assisted practices like vibe coding, in which assistants accelerate individual developers, towards Agentic Software Engineering (ASE), in which autonomous agents are delegated goal-level tasks. However, industry reports a productivity paradox: as individual productivity increases, team throughput, review capacity, and stability degrade because team-scale software engineering discipline is neglected. Objective: This paper aims to establish the conceptual and methodological foundations of Spec-Driven Development (SDD) as an enabling discipline for ASE at team scale and characterize the harness, i.e., the technical and methodological mechanisms through which teams govern agent behavior. Method: We conducted a conceptual analysis drawing predominantly on gray literature, including ASE vision and roadmap papers, practitioner reports, talks, and tooling, because peer-reviewed evidence and a shared academic-industrial vocabulary are not yet established. Results: Using a comparative characterization of the paradigm progression as conceptual framing, the article presents (i) a socio-technical model of SDD in which specifications act as the contract substrate between humans and agents; (ii) an operational characterization of the harness, distinguishing the technical harness around the agent from the methodological harness around the team, with worked examples; and (iii) a typology of five human--agent interaction patterns through which the human role is redefined. Conclusion: We conclude that SDD reconstitutes, in specification-centric form, the contracts that vibe coding dissolves: accountability, verifiability, and transferability. Given the immaturity of the evidence base, this work is presented as a first step toward academic-industrial consensus rather than a validated theory, and outlines a research agenda for future empirical validation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Update from Hell: Can Coding Agents Survive Hidden Breakage in Dependency Upgrades?
Drift-Aware LLM Routing with Sparse Contexts and Shared Budgets
Redefining Stablecoins from Nominal to Real Value: A Maximum Likelihood Approach
LEAP: Likelihood Elicitation and Aggregation for LLM-based Probabilistic Forecasting
MedAgent-R1: Faithfulness-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Evidence-Grounded Medical Reasoning
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.