arXiv preprint ·

ExoPlanetLab: Bayesian orbit fitting of Gaia-DR4 epoch astrometry, radial velocities and relative astrometry

David Hobbs

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Instrumentation & Methods for AstrophysicsEarth & Planetary AstrophysicsAstrophysics of GalaxiesSolar & Stellar Astrophysics

Abstract

Gaia Data Release 4 (DR4) provides epoch astrometry from which thousands of giant planets and many substellar and stellar companions can be characterised. We present ExoPlanetLab, an open-source package for Bayesian orbit inference from Gaia epoch astrometry, radial velocities (RVs) and relative astrometry, validated on simulated and real data. The model orbit is compared with the epoch residuals after removing the part absorbed by the single-star fit. A Student-t likelihood describes heavy-tailed data. A robust Keplerian periodogram with bootstrap false-alarm probabilities gives starting values for a joint fit. Five samplers are available: tempered ensemble MCMC, two nested samplers and two reversible-jump samplers. Evidences for a fixed number of companions select that number. Acceleration and scan-angle models test whether an orbit is warranted. The samplers agree within 0.1 sigma on a simulated two-planet system. In 180 injections all fits converge, and all signals with signal-to-noise ratio S >= 10 are detected. The posteriors show no significant bias, but the period coverage is below nominal: 90% of the true periods lie within their 95% credible intervals. None of 30 companion-free data sets gives a false detection. On DR4 pre-release data the orbit of Gaia BH3 is recovered within 1.4 sigma of published solutions. The Student-t model brings the astrometric period and eccentricity of HD 114762 onto its RV orbit. Eight simulated relative positions narrow the period's credible interval to 0.27 of its width, and Octofitter agrees within 0.2 sigma on the same data. The code is validated for single sources with DR4-like epoch astrometry, with or without RVs. Relative astrometry is tested on simulated data only. The main limits are an uncorrelated noise model and the computing cost, which grows linearly with the number of measurements and steeply with the number of companions.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Instrumentation & Methods for Astrophysics

Get the few papers worth your time in Instrumentation & Methods for Astrophysics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics