arXiv preprint ·

Hybrid Machine Learning for Imbalanced Landing-Phase Safety Event Prediction from Flight Data

Taha Asghar, Bilal Mufti, Syed Qasim Zaheer and Luqman Ahmed

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine LearningArtificial Intelligence

In brief

Spotting Rare Risks on the Way Down

The authors combine a sequence model’s measure of unusual behavior with statistical summaries of flight parameters, then use a class-weighted classifier to identify event types. Across 53,750 approach windows from three airports, the method achieved mean macro recall above 0.90 and offered clues about which operational variables shaped its predictions.

What they found: Across 53,750 approach windows from three airports, the framework achieved mean macro recall above 0.90 across all airports under repeated partitioning and retraining. Component comparisons found that class weighting mattered and that continuous feature fusion performed better than using reconstruction error alone or a hard-gate alternative.

AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.

Abstract

Landing-phase safety-event prediction requires the detection of rare abnormal approaches within strongly imbalanced multivariate flight data. Capturing coupled temporal behavior while distinguishing event-specific signatures across airport operating contexts remains a central modeling challenge. This study proposes an interpretable hybrid feature-fusion framework for multiclass landing-phase safety-event prediction. A long short-term memory (LSTM) autoencoder trained on nominal flight windows characterizes deviations from routine approach behavior. Its continuous reconstruction-error descriptor is fused with parameter-specific statistical flight-history features and supplied to a class-weighted XGBoost classifier to distinguish Normal, Speed High, Path High, and Flaps Late windows. The framework is evaluated using 53,750 NASA DASHlink approach windows from three arrival airports. Pooled and airport-specific learning strategies are compared alongside component-level benchmarks, repeated pipeline retraining, and feature-attribution analysis. The results demonstrate strong class-balanced detection, with mean macro recall above 0.90 across all airports under repeated partitioning and retraining. Component comparisons establish the importance of class weighting and show that continuous feature fusion outperforms reconstruction-error-only and hard-gate alternatives. Airport-level comparisons reveal benefits from local specialization at the two airports with larger datasets and from pooled training at the airport with the smallest dataset. Feature attributions associate predictions with operationally relevant vertical-path, configuration, speed, and approach-context variables. The framework provides an interpretable approach to rare-event detection and practical guidance for adapting flight-data monitoring models to airport-level data availability.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics