arXiv preprint ·
Can an LLM Actually Reason and Program about Neural Network's Weights or is it just memorization on steroids? Exploring "Weight-Space Programming"
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have recently been reported to read and write the raw weights of neural networks directly, a capability termed weight-space programming. We ask whether the reading side of this capability reflects reasoning about weight flows or a combination of local arithmetic at the network's edges and memorized priors over public datasets. We test Claude Opus 5.5 on small convolutional networks of about 125,000 parameters trained on five image datasets, providing every weight as plain text with no tools, no forward passes, and no dataset or class names. The model performs accurate local calculations: batch-normalization statistics lead it to infer about three optimizer steps on networks stopped after three updates, and output-layer sign patterns recover the vehicle/animal split of CIFAR-10. The sessions report reading the first and last layers closely and sampling the middle, and several claims built on partial tracing fail verification, although we did not run a direct forward-pass test. Semantic judgments lean on familiar datasets: the model names CIFAR-10 for CIFAR-10 networks but also for all three fast-food networks, relabels KMNIST as MNIST, reads a 99.57%-accurate SAT-6 network as CIFAR-10 animal photos, and calls "frog" the output favored by a feature that fires most on trees. Permuting CIFAR-10's labels preserves the output split at the new indices, but every class pair the model interprets is then wrong, indicating reliance on remembered label order. These are exploratory results from mostly single runs. We conclude that zero-shot weight reading by this model is better described as local arithmetic plus dataset priors than as weight-flow tracing, and we provide a protocol for auditing future weight-space claims.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
TriAttention: Unified Sparse Mixed-Precision Attention for Long-Context LLM Inference
Evolutionary Adaptive Neighborhood Learning: A Genetic Algorithm for Instance-Dependent k Optimization in Nearest Neighbor Classification
How Deep is the Signal? Time-Context up to 30 Years for Colorectal Cancer Prediction in a Primary-Care EHR Model
Satisficing as competitive Bayesian weighting: a minimal model of goal-directed choice under an unattained target
Efficient Diffusion Policy Fine Tuning with Latent Noise Representation Bridging
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.