arXiv preprint ·
How Finite Brains Generalize Without Bound: Spatial Memory as a Universal Computer
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A child who learns to add small numbers adds numbers of any length. LSTMs and Transformers trained on short sequences fail on longer ones. We trace the difference to what a learner reads when it decides. A position, a count or a time keeps taking new values as the input grows: it is a coordinate, and a learner that reads one meets in every long input values its experience never covered. Whether two things are the same has the same two answers at every size: it is a coincidence, and a learner that reads only coincidences finds in a long input nothing that short inputs lacked, so finite experience fixes its rule for every size. The memory carries the size of the input and the rule stays finite, and this determines the memory a generalizing brain can have: a memory that grows while what the learner reads of it stays finite has to look the same from every place, so it is made of cycles, and the past is reached by asking what happened when the cycles last stood where they stand now. The cycles are the grid modules, the cells that detect their return the place cells, the records the hippocampal index; a prefrontal controller moves the cycles and never sees them. Reading only coincidences costs no power: what finite experience fixes in such a learner is what Turing machines compute in step with their input, which is why a circuit that evolved to find the way home can learn arithmetic and grammar. In a network of neurons this machine of cycles is the dynamics seen through its symmetry, and symbols are its invariants. Trained on strings up to 40 symbols, the machine is at least 99% correct, on average over lengths 41 to 500, on nine of fifteen benchmark tasks, five of them tasks that no LSTM or Transformer solves; given new cycles after training it reverses strings of 15,015 symbols without error and fails beyond that on the curve the theory predicts; and its controllers run unchanged on neurons.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
TriAttention: Unified Sparse Mixed-Precision Attention for Long-Context LLM Inference
Evolutionary Adaptive Neighborhood Learning: A Genetic Algorithm for Instance-Dependent k Optimization in Nearest Neighbor Classification
How Deep is the Signal? Time-Context up to 30 Years for Colorectal Cancer Prediction in a Primary-Care EHR Model
Satisficing as competitive Bayesian weighting: a minimal model of goal-directed choice under an unattained target
Efficient Diffusion Policy Fine Tuning with Latent Noise Representation Bridging
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.