arXiv preprint ·
Operationalizing NCII and CSAM Law in the Age of AI: Open Problems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Advances in generative AI have driven a surge in synthetic non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII) and child sexual abuse material (CSAM), prompting a series of legal reforms. These reforms rely on legal definitions where technical operationalization is ambiguous, such as whether a depicted person is identifiable, whether a model is capable of or intended for abuse generation, and whether an abusive image can be traced to the model that produced it. Drawing on the law of England and Wales and the United States, we examine the relevant law alongside the technical research needed to operationalize it. From this, we develop a research agenda of open problems at this technical-legal interface, spanning the interpretation of existing law, the prevention of harm before an AI tool is deployed, and enforcement of offenses. These are problems the technical community is well placed to solve, and where progress is vital to real-world protection.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Code, Commits, and Complexity in the GenAI Era: A Longitudinal Study of Team-Based Capstone Projects
Digital Security Under Compound Threats: Surveillance, Threat Reasoning, and Habituation Among North Korean Defectors in China
The Popular Get More Popular: Auditing Brand Bias in Generative Search
AraEngage: Interpretable Linguistic Correlates of Engagement in Arabic Facebook News
How Generative AI Redefines Personalization and Diversity in the Newsroom
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.