arXiv preprint ·
What Gets Hacked in a Collaborative Reward for LLM Recommenders: The Part That Does Not Depend on the User
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Collaborative-filtering (CF) scores provide graded, personalized rewards for training large language model (LLM) recommenders through reinforcement learning. However, these rewards can cause exposure collapse: even though the CF model itself produces diverse top recommendations across users, an LLM optimized with its rewards concentrates on fewer items. We decompose each score into an item-mean component, the item's average CF score across user histories, and a residual component, the current user's score deviation from the average. Through controlled interventions, we identify the item-mean component as a contributor to exposure collapse. Accordingly, we propose two reward corrections: per-item centering removes each item's estimated mean score, while per-item standardization further rescales the residual using its estimated standard deviation. Experiments on two datasets with two identifier schemes show that both corrections substantially improve catalog coverage and exposure evenness. Compared with training on the uncorrected CF reward, our corrections increase the number of distinct items ranked first across users by up to $9.8\times$, while maintaining comparable ranking accuracy. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LLM4Rec-CF-Bias-27EF/.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
Reducing Representational Interference in Retrieval Embeddings with Trainable Prefix Tokens
CacheGraft: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Latent-Space Document Enrichment
BRIDGE: Bridging the Semantic Quantization Gap for Generative Recommendation
MEvince: Knowledge-Constrained LLM Reasoning for Technique Identification from Malware Reports
OptST: Optimizing Semantic Tokenization for LLM-Enhanced Recommendation
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.