arXiv preprint ·
Fine-Tuning a Transducer for Impaired Speech: Where the Gains Appear and What They Mean for Evaluation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Speech recognition still works poorly for many people whose speech is affected by conditions such as ALS, Parkinson's disease, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome or stroke. We took part in the Speech Accessibility Project Challenge 2 (SAPC2) with a public speech recognizer that we fine-tuned on the challenge data. Our best entry scored 7.81% character error rate on Test1, the first of two hidden test sets (official baseline 15.26%). Our live entries ran on CPUs with a combined median latency of about 0.9 seconds at 7.96-8.07% error. On new speakers, fine-tuning reduced errors most for the speakers that an off-the-shelf recognizer finds hardest to understand. Sentences already seen in training had far lower error rates than new ones (2.58% vs 6.42%), a larger difference than being a familiar speaker made. We close with lessons for evaluating such systems.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
HyFlash: A Prefix-Memory Prior for On-Device Speculative Decoding
Encoding and Propagation of Grammatical Number in Large Language Models
EnvOpt: Automated Optimization for Agent Environments
Latency-Aware Adaptive Best-of-$N$
The Last Mile to the Real World: Agent-Native Primitives as Reusable Building Blocks for Solving Real-World Tasks
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.