Double Machine Learning for Panel Data: Identification, Specification, and a Bank Regulation Effect

Abstract

This paper examines robustness and causal interpretation of panel estimates using double/debiased machine learning. The prototype treatment setup is the 2018 US banking regulation. Under common treatment timing, we characterize identification and nuisance restrictions and derive exact bank-level representations of specified "within" and "first-difference" scores. Simulations assess panel model transformation-induced specification bias and inference under weaker overlap. Empirically, estimates vary with asset-size classification and prior growth. Prior-growth adjustment reduces overlap-weighted estimates across four Machine Learners (ML); doubly robust estimates depend on the fitted propensity and concentrated weights. Both bank groups received relief, so we estimate differential exposure effects. The findings highlight specification issues and the relation between functional-form robustness and causal identification.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

More in Econometrics

• arXiv preprint · 4 November 2026

  Offline Learning of Reserve Prices from Censored Bids

  Lavanya Marla, Yunzong Xu and Boxuan Zhou
• arXiv preprint · 5 November 2026

  Patch Attention Wisely: Understanding Patch Length in Attention-Based Forecasting

  Junyu Chen, Likai Chen and Weining Wang
• arXiv preprint · 4 November 2026

  Regression with Many Generated Controls

  Timothy Christensen and Daniel Vebman
• arXiv preprint · 3 November 2026

  Regret-based Characterization, Information Limits, and the Sample Complexity of Auditing Adaptive Policies

  Irene Aldridge
• arXiv preprint · 2 November 2026

  Specification LASSO and a Flexible Characteristics-Based Asset Pricing Model

  Chaohua Dong, Shuyi Ge, Shaoran Li and 1 other

All new papers in Econometrics