arXiv preprint ·
Depth or Description? When a One-Step Latent Score Replaces Lookahead in Proactive Information Acquisition
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A proactive agent must decide what to ask before it acts. Exact lookahead values combinations of questions but is expensive and leans on a fitted model; a one-step score is cheap but can miss them. Our main finding: the need for depth often lies in how the hidden cause is described. A one-step score on the label can be blind to an interaction among answers. A score on a suitable latent cause is not, and where that latent encodes the decision it replaces most of depth at a fraction of the search. Described differently, the same problem can defeat the score while exact values do not move, so keep the latent small and check it against exact values. Probabilities learned from one language model's answers do not carry to another unless planning allows for both; those read from tokens are worth only a few labels.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
BobFlow: Towards Human-Agent Collaborative Data Science Using Dataflows
TriAttention: Unified Sparse Mixed-Precision Attention for Long-Context LLM Inference
How Well Can Large Language Models Impersonate Individual Authors? A Comparative Evaluation
Evolutionary Adaptive Neighborhood Learning: A Genetic Algorithm for Instance-Dependent k Optimization in Nearest Neighbor Classification
Unsupervised Neural Operators for Rotating Relativistic Stars: High-Fidelity Equation of State Inference and Pulsar Spin Evolution at Scale
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.