arXiv preprint ·
A trust layer for fast pedestal-stability surrogates: calibrated error bars, out-of-distribution alarms and few-shot recalibration
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Machine-learning surrogates of linear peeling-ballooning stability now run in milliseconds, but they are mostly deployed as point estimators: they do not say how wrong they may be, or when a query lies outside what they were trained on. For a fusion company designing a new device, every equilibrium of interest is outside the training data of existing surrogates, so this is the case that matters. We describe a model-agnostic trust layer for stability surrogates, made of conformal error bars, out-of-distribution alarms that route doubtful cases to the physics code, and recalibration from a few simulations of a new design, and we test it with pre-registered hypotheses. On a large public dataset of JET-like equilibria with ideal-MHD growth rates, the error bars hold their nominal coverage in distribution and fall short under a shift in plasma shape; a few dozen simulations of the new shape, or routing the cases the alarms flag, restore it. On resistive BOUT++ surrogates, the bars stay calibrated on held-out runs, the alarm flags tokamaks absent from training, and a scenario scan is screened in seconds instead of hours. Across equilibria from the SPARC library and the DIII-D coil set, a surrogate trained on our own graded BOUT++ labels beats the baseline on unseen equilibria, while a surrogate trained elsewhere ranks the same cases backwards and its alarm declines them. Building our own neural-operator surrogate, the harness exposed two input defects whose fix closed its gap to a simple network. For every surrogate tested, the trust layer keeps coverage near target, with a bar width set by that surrogate's own error. Not every pre-registered hypothesis held, and we report those results and the limits of all of them.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Winding-Pack Quench Simulation of Stellarator Coils: Hydraulic Field-Network Coupling and Transverse Heat Conduction in OPENSC$^2$
Field-aligned measurement removes the anisotropy barrier of sample-based quantum subspace solvers for magnetized-plasma heat conduction
Eddies that ride the flow: a model of turbulence with Richardson dispersion and anomalous dissipation
The shear Alfvén continuum of optimized stellarators
Interstellar and intergalactic medium in the ultraviolet band
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.