arXiv preprint ·
Flexible Intensities Matter: A Comprehensive Re-evaluation of Hawkes Processes and Neural Temporal Point Processes
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Temporal point processes (TPPs) are the canonical framework for event sequence data, with applications spanning seismology, social media, and electronic health records. Recently, neural TPPs have been reported to substantially outperform classical TPPs, such as Hawkes processes, but these comparisons pitted flexible neural models against Hawkes processes in their most restricted form, and did not consider large-scale medical data. Here, we revisit this comparison through a systematic evaluation of Poisson and Hawkes processes of increasing flexibility against neural TPPs, on five established benchmark datasets and on two large-scale medical evaluation tasks derived from UK Biobank disease histories and MIMIC-IV ICU records, under autoregressive next-event prediction. First, the previously reported gap between Hawkes processes and neural TPPs largely disappears once Hawkes processes are equipped with flexible, learnable baselines and kernels. Second, the flexibility of the intensity parametrization also limits prior neural TPPs: a Transformer with a spline-based intensity head outperforms previous intensity-based neural TPPs and is on par with the intensity-free model. Decomposing the log-likelihood into a time term $\log p(t)$ and a type term $\log p(d \mid t)$, we find that this flexibility advantage lies almost entirely in the time density: more flexibility does not improve the type term. On these benchmarks, the gains of neural TPPs thus lie mostly in modeling when events occur, not which. Third, our results underscore the value of complex datasets for evaluating TPPs: only on the MIMIC-IV ICU records do neural TPPs retain an advantage in the type term. Our results inform both future method development and model choice. We release our framework, TorchPP, as an open-source package with consistent implementations of classical and neural TPPs.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Discovering like a scientist: Literature-informed dimensionless learning for physical closure of data-driven equations
Satisficing as competitive Bayesian weighting: a minimal model of goal-directed choice under an unattained target
Towards the Query Complexity of Sampling under Strong Log-Concavity and Log-Sobolev Inequalities
Neural Realized Measures: Forecast-Supervised Intraday Aggregation for Volatility Forecasting
A low-rank decoder bottleneck bounds reliability in foundation-model perturbation prediction
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.