arXiv preprint ·
METRIC-GS: Selective Metric-Scale Estimation for 3D Gaussian Splatting
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) reconstruction inherits arbitrary units from structure-from-motion, so it cannot be measured or used to place AR content until someone supplies a scale. Both standard recipes are fragile on real captures: on five indoor scenes with tape-measured ceilings, a quantile floor-to-ceiling heuristic errs by 27% and metric-depth alignment by 35-71% across three networks. We present METRIC-GS, a selective scale estimator for real indoor photographs: it reads the scale off the reconstruction's own semantic content and, just as importantly, refuses when the evidence is thin. A frozen 2D teacher labels Gaussians by visibility-aware voting; instance-level size priors for architectural and furniture classes (doors, tables, the floor-to-ceiling gap) are fused by a robust maximum-likelihood step; and an inlier-mass test turns thin evidence into an explicit abstention that doubles as a router to a heavyweight metric model. On 47 ScanNet++ scenes with laser ground truth, with a configuration frozen before public evaluation, the estimator alone cuts the heuristic's mean error from 21.1% to 16.6% (9.3% on the 28 scenes it acts on) at ~11 s per scene. MASt3R remains the more accurate standalone estimator (9.9%), but routing only our refusals to it matches running it everywhere with 60% fewer invocations; this selective hybrid is the configuration we advocate. Visibility-aware voting raises the scenes the estimator can act on from 16 to 28 at unchanged deployed accuracy. Applied unchanged to 13 phone and drone captures of our own, on which MASt3R fails its own registration gate 12 times, the system improves all five captures it acts on and degrades none. We also report that a current feed-forward metric model scores 2.3% on a benchmark inside its training mixture and 28-35% on captures it has never seen: a published metric-scale number is a best case, not a deployment estimate.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
ME^2FDiff: Multiscale Expert Enhancing Feature Diffusion in Residual Network for Brain Tumor Segmentation
Householder Motion Embedding: Noise Modulation for Motion-Controllable Video Generation
WayPOP: A Panoramic Open-Set Panoptic Tracking Benchmark
ArtiVidRM: Verifiable Artifact-as-Rubric Reward Modeling for Explicit Quality Articulation in Video Generation
GREP: Grounding Generated Room Evaluation in Principles
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.