arXiv preprint ·

Functional inequalities from the fundamental limits of Bayesian estimation

Shuchen Li and Ilias Zadik

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Information TheoryProbabilityStatistics Theory

Abstract

We develop a Bayesian information-theoretic framework for proving functional inequalities for log-concave measures. Motivated by Klartag and Ordentlich, we establish a unified equivalence between $Φ$-Sobolev inequalities and Bayesian estimation lower bounds: for a large class of smooth convex $Φ$, a log-concave measure $μ$ satisfies a $Φ$-Sobolev inequality with constant $C>0$ if and only if for $X\simμ$, any $t>0$, and any real-valued measurable $f$, the Bayes risk of estimating $f(X)$ under the $Φ$-Bregman loss from the Gaussian additive observation $Y_t=\sqrt tX+G, G\sim N(0,I_n)$ is at least a $1/(1+Ct)$-fraction of that of the trivial estimator. Combining it with direct information-theoretic arguments, such as testing-to-estimation reductions, we obtain old and new functional inequalities: - For the Poincaré inequality, corresponding to $Φ(x)=(x-1)^2$, we give a simple static information-theoretic proof that the Poincaré constant of an isotropic log-concave measure on $\mathbb{R}^n$ is $O(n^{1/2})$, first proven via stochastic localization in the seminal work of Lee and Vempala. - For the log-Sobolev inequality, corresponding to $Φ(x)=x\log x$, we prove that all smooth $K$-subgaussian log-concave measures $μ$ satisfy $C_{\mathrm{LS}}(μ)\lesssim K^2n^{1/4}$, surpassing the recent state-of-the-art bound of $O(K^2n^{1/2})$ by Bizeul. In parallel and independent work, OpenAI claimed the optimal bound $O(K^2)$ in their October 6, 2026 release of 722 papers. - Finally, we give a Bayesian reformulation of the common structure of the three recent proofs of the Kannan--Lovász--Simonovits conjecture, a dimension-free Poincaré bound for isotropic log-concave measures [BK26; BKL26; SZ26]. Tools from the study of the "low-degree MMSE" in computational complexity of statistical inference motivate and recast key steps and quantities of these proofs.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Information Theory

Get the few papers worth your time in Information Theory every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics