arXiv preprint ·
Construct Validity of Coding Benchmarks for LLM-based Agentic Coding Tools
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Software developers increasingly adopt LLM-based agentic coding tools to assist them with development tasks. To provide developers with up-to-date information on these tools' effectiveness, prior work introduced benchmarks that enable comparisons across tools. Despite the widespread adoption of such benchmarks, however, recent work has shown that they suffer from issues threatening their validity. Aims. In this work, we aim to complement prior work by analyzing the construct validity of agentic coding benchmarks. Methodology. We analyze nine benchmarks commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of agentic coding tools. We identify the constructs that the benchmarks claim to measure, the metrics used to operationalize them, and potential confounders that interfere with the measurement. Results. Our findings show that benchmarks commonly operationalize broad concepts such as coding capability with only a small set of metrics. The reported attributes that might confound the measurements vary between benchmarks, indicating a lack of standardization. Conclusions. We conclude with recommendations to strengthen construct validity in agentic coding benchmarks and encourage further empirical work to better understand the effectiveness of agentic coding tools.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Validation-Gated ML Pipeline Synthesis with Expert-Grounded Self-Evolving Skills
DARE: Difficulty Analysis for Repair Enhancement
Are We Just Applying LLMs? What SE Research Studies, Underexplores, and Could Do Next in the LLM Era
A Hybrid Approach for Automated Security Pattern Recovery
Planning-Coding Separation in LLM-Based Code Generation: An Empirical Study
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.