arXiv preprint ·
Quantifying Trait-State Hierarchy in EEG Foundation Model and Signal Processing Embeddings
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) measures brain activity through recording electrical potentials of the scalp. EEG recordings capture two distinct sets of characteristics in the signal: (1) \emph{Traits} -- information that remains relatively constant over the course of a recording session, such as subject identity, age, and sex; (2) \emph{States} -- signatures that encode responses to external stimuli, including visual, auditory, and motor information. There is limited understanding of how different EEG modeling features (signal processing and foundation models) encode state and trait characteristics. In this work, we quantify state- and trait-level features captured by EEG embeddings using a hierarchy metric and kNN purity on Brain-Computer Interface dataset trials, and find that a majority of EEG features form a macro-trait hierarchy (embeddings form trait-level clusters with micro-states within). Our linear probe results indicate that this hierarchy structure leads to suboptimal state distinguishability, negatively impacting BCI performance of EEG foundation models. To mitigate this, we explore normalization techniques that reduce trait-specific information in embeddings and provide a $\sim$ 10\% improvement in balanced accuracy for state classification. Additionally, we observe that when fine-tuning models for downstream state decoding, embedding spaces transform from macro-trait to macro-state hierarchies, which in turn lead to better state decoding.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Swapping the Judge Changes the Ranking: A Preregistered Study of Cross-Provider Replication in LLM-Judged System Comparisons
BobFlow: Towards Human-Agent Collaborative Data Science Using Dataflows
The Agent Board: Kanban for Machines; Durable Coordination for Agents That Outlive the Conversation
How Well Can Large Language Models Impersonate Individual Authors? A Comparative Evaluation
Structured Clinical Memory as Context for Probabilistic Decision Models: A Synthetic Evaluation with Jev
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.