arXiv preprint ·
Mitigating Return Drag and Regime Whipsaws in Sector Rotation: An Asymmetric Downside-Aware Nested Clustered Optimization Framework
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Hierarchical clustering and Nested Clustered Optimization (NCO) mitigate the mathematical ill-conditioning of classical Markowitz covariance matrices. However, two structural vulnerabilities persist in equity markets: (1) symmetric variance penalizes upside and downside return dispersion identically, inducing acute return drag against soaring momentum sectors; and (2) unconstrained Hidden Markov Models (HMM) exhibit hyper-active regime switching (whipsaw instability), incurring excessive turnover and transaction drag. We propose Asymmetric Downside-Risk Nested Clustered Optimization with Sticky Regime Dynamics (Asym-Sticky-NCO) for tactical sector rotation across all 11 S&P 500 GICS sectors. The framework substitutes symmetric covariance with the Bawa-Lindenberg downside semi-covariance matrix across both hierarchical tree clustering and two-stage allocation. Furthermore, we introduce a Sticky Gaussian HMM incorporating a diagonal self-transition persistence prior (\k{appa}) and confidence-adaptive boundaries (δ) to enforce macroeconomic persistence. Strictly non-anticipative walk-forward backtesting across 65 out-of-sample months (August 2020 to December 2025) demonstrates that the architecture elevates CAGR from 10.65% (Plain NCO) to 13.41% (+276 bps/year), delivers a 97.74% total return versus 72.99%, suppresses maximum drawdown to 14.22% (versus 23.93% for the S&P 500), and achieves a Calmar ratio of 0.94 (+38.2% over S&P 500; +84.3% over Baseline Regime-NCO). Crucially, sticky dynamics cut regime whipsaws by 75.0% (from 16 to 4 switches) and reduce monthly turnover from 60.78% to 30.48%, addressing core limitations of machine learning asset allocation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Portfolio Management
Safe Portfolio Learning from Untrusted Predictions: Signed Trust, Abstention, and Cross-Universe Polarity Failure
Constrained defined-contribution pension management: A reparameterized neural network approach
Interpretable Allocation and Model-Predictive Rebalancing of Equity Portfolios, Tested on Real and Synthetic Markets
Specification LASSO and a Flexible Characteristics-Based Asset Pricing Model
Penalize the Common Trade: A Collision-Aware Layer for Learned Portfolios
Get the few papers worth your time in Portfolio Management every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.