arXiv preprint ·

When Category Means Move: A Paired-Support Audit of Recommendation Logs with Random Insertions

Yu Zhang, Zhihan Wang, Yuhang Lu and Shuai Li

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Information Retrieval

Abstract

Content-category dashboards summarize production recommendation logs, although the serving policy selects the users, items, and contexts behind each mean. Using KuaiRand random-insertion impressions, we audit these summaries on the same 12,472 users and 5,486 videos in both logs. Standard means have absolute/centered mean absolute error (MAE) 0.1935/0.0491 and rank correlation 0.7833. User demeaning plus a random grand-mean anchor reduces absolute MAE by 80.0%, but centered MAE by only 21.0%, without reliably improving rank. A complete-support ledger allocates weighted squared error mainly to within-video residual (72.41%) and video mix (23.90%), with 3.65% from random support. In a frozen later test, early category calibration reaches MAE 0.0251 versus 0.0531 for scalar calibration; their direct difference is -0.0280 [-0.0296, -0.0172]. Decision evidence is cutoff-specific: the nominal top-10 regret change for row-weighted demeaning versus naive is -0.0062 [-0.0084, -0.0003], while top-5 and top-20 intervals include zero. The six-contrast family-wise top-10 interval [-0.0136, 0.0013] includes zero. An outcome-free disjoint randomized-reference split also leaves all six nominal contrasts covering zero. A known-truth stress test shows incomplete improvement under a mean-additive positive control and failure under item mix and weak overlap. All decompositions are descriptive and each result is conditional on its overlap cohort. KuaiRand intervals quantify user-cluster variation conditional on the realized catalog and calendar; we claim neither intrinsic category effects nor a universally valid correction.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Information Retrieval

Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics