arXiv preprint ·
Shared Context Candidate Scoring with Jointly Adapted Readout Networks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Repeated decisions over a shared document create two distinct opportunities: reusing document computation and adapting how question representations score candidate answers. We present Q64, a candidate-scoring system that preserves a frozen 64-layer Qwen3.8-27B text backbone, reuses its hybrid prefix state and intermediate document representations, and jointly trains a residual adapter with a four-layer decoder and candidate-conditioned readout. We used ZiYor, a self-evolving AI system, to explore and refine the Q64 design. We specified the scoring method, implemented the system, and evaluated its accuracy and latency. The final adaptation stage updates 88.66 million parameters using 8,192 selected training views. On a fixed 5,112-item evaluation combining ARC-Challenge, ANLI-R3, and stratified subsets of MMLU-Pro and CMMLU, joint adaptation improves four-benchmark macro accuracy from 66.46% to 74.32%. It remains below the native 27B baseline at 75.68% and AnyJev Qwen3-32B L0 at 76.68%. On a separate synthetic workload with 4,096 document tokens and 50 questions, median cold-request latency is 2.237 seconds, compared with 5.383 seconds for the native baseline and 56.872 seconds for the measured batched AnyJev configuration. Short single-question requests do not share this advantage. The evidence supports an accuracy-latency tradeoff in the evaluated systems, rather than a backbone reduction or an isolated component advantage. Public benchmarks informed earlier development, and real-document multi-question validation remains open.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Swapping the Judge Changes the Ranking: A Preregistered Study of Cross-Provider Replication in LLM-Judged System Comparisons
How Well Can Large Language Models Impersonate Individual Authors? A Comparative Evaluation
Same Rule, Different Verdicts: Rubric Language and Clause Structure in LLM Judges for Korean Support Dialogues
Phonological Knowledge of Chinese Characters in Language Models
When Strong Reasoners Join the Pool: Small Union Premiums and Costly Runaway Generations in LLM Routing
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.