arXiv preprint ·
The Hyperclique Hypothesis is False
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The Hyperclique Hypothesis postulates that, for all constants $k > h \geq 3$, detecting a $k$-clique in an $h$-uniform hypergraph with $n$ vertices requires time $n^{k-o(1)}$. This hypothesis is false: there is an algebraic algorithm that detects (and even counts) $k$-cliques in $h$-uniform hypergraphs in time $O(n^{(1-ε_h)k})$. Via known reductions, this also refutes the recently proposed $k$-AP Hypothesis. As a consequence, many problems with conditional lower bounds based on these two hypotheses may admit faster algorithms after all. This result is almost entirely due to AI.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Data Structures & Algorithms
Get the few papers worth your time in Data Structures & Algorithms every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.