arXiv preprint ·
Not All Reasoning Generalizes: A Case Study on Learning Generalizable Reasoning Strategies in RLVR
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can enable generalizable improvement for large language model (LLM) reasoning. This paper studies how to incentivize such generalization via reasoning strategies. We study this question with a controllable equation-solving framework: finding multiple inputs x for equations f(x)=y, where f is a non-bijective string function. This setting makes reasoning strategies observable while supporting a clear definition of easy-to-hard out-of-distribution (OOD) shifts, e.g., more solutions, longer y, etc. We uncover a subtle RLVR failure: it teaches the model to solve in-distribution tasks with high accuracy and structured step-by-step derivation, yet under OOD shifts, the same model abandons derivation and collapses to ineffective brute-force enumeration, causing sharp accuracy drops. This observation reveals the deeper challenges of RLVR generalization as it is neither incapable base model nor reward hacking, since the model succeeds in-distribution with the correct reasoning strategy. The key to mitigating this failure is an indirect intervention that surprisingly helps: co-training with bijective inversion tasks. Although these bijective tasks are actually not uniformly harder and even further from the non-bijective OOD evaluation, they make derivation more certain and substantially restore the correct strategy and accuracy under OOD shifts. This effect further motivates our theoretical analysis: outcome-only RLVR can shape reasoning processes through implicitly crediting the effective reasoning strategies more, even without process supervision. To conclude, our analysis framework and findings systematically reveal the crucial role and incentivization of reasoning strategies in RLVR generalization under OOD shifts. Code is available at https://github.com/ziqipang/rl_meta_thinking.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
CytoWave: Perturbation-Centric Pretraining for Single-Cell Response Prediction
ScaleTraj: Scale-Decomposed Human Trajectory Generation
Improving Financial Cybersecurity Through Fraud Transaction Detection with Deep Learning
When Strong Reasoners Join the Pool: Small Union Premiums and Costly Runaway Generations in LLM Routing
A Capitulation Direction Emerges With Scale and Is Causally Load-Bearing Where Validation Is Strong: Eight Models, Two Families, and Five Measurement Hazards
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.