arXiv preprint ·

Online Algorithms Cannot Find Isolated Perceptron Solutions

Shuangping Li and Gabe Schoenbach

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computational ComplexityData Structures & AlgorithmsMathematical PhysicsProbability

Abstract

The binary perceptron problem asks for a length-$n$ sign vector in the intersection of $\lfloor αn\rfloor$-many independent random Gaussian half-spaces. A striking feature of this model is strong freezing: at every constraint density $α> 0$, all but a vanishing fraction of solutions are isolated -- $Ω(n)$-far from all others, in Hamming distance. Such solutions are believed to be algorithmically inaccessible. Nevertheless, efficient algorithms find solutions at some constraint densities $α$. One possible resolution of this apparent contradiction is that the solution space also contains rare well-connected structures, and that algorithms succeed by locating them. Gong, Huang, Li and Sellke (FOCS 2026) proved this for stable algorithms, by showing that such algorithms cannot locate isolated solutions with probability more than $\approx 0.84$. In this work, we study online algorithms, which receive the columns of the constraint matrix one by one and sign each irrevocably upon arrival. This is a widely used class of algorithms in discrepancy minimization, and it includes the algorithm of Jo and Lee (2026), which has one of the best provable guarantees for the binary perceptron. We prove that at any constraint density, any online algorithm outputs an isolated solution with probability $o(1)$. Our proof is based on the observation that the signs an online algorithm has already fixed can be completed to at most one isolated solution, so a successful algorithm must choose the unique correct sign for each of the last few columns. Using the exchangeability of these columns, we show that such an algorithm must match a suffix-parallel baseline, which signs each of them as if it were the next column to arrive. We then use an anti-concentration argument to show that such a baseline rarely produces a unique completion.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computational Complexity

Get the few papers worth your time in Computational Complexity every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics