arXiv preprint ·
Forecasting How RLHF Responds to Reward-Model Edits Before Training
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Responses with headers, lists and greater length receive high scores from reward models (RMs), and RLHF policies learn to produce these features even when true quality does not improve. Practitioners therefore edit their RMs, but they learn whether an edit works only after an RL run. We show that the response of a policy to an RM edit can be forecast before training, from samples of the current policy and the scores of the old and new RM. If we read the RM as a set of prices, the first-order theory of KL-regularized RL implies that each feature moves in proportion to its within-prompt covariance with the change in reward. We implant controlled price changes into retrained RMs under a 2^(4-1) fractional factorial design with a self-distilled placebo, run 54 RL runs from six parent policies, and fix every forecast before the runs. With the covariance predictor, we predict the direction of all 20 changes in supply whose forecast has the same sign at every parent and explain 82% of the standardized change. With counterfactual prices, the classical alternative, we explain 50%. The forecast also holds under GRPO and for real RM upgrades, where we explain 66% out of sample with a coefficient frozen from the factorial runs. For rent, the gap between the proxy reward and a gold reward from stronger judges, we rank RM edits correctly with the same covariance over the first 30 steps (Spearman 0.94). This measures the horizon of the forecast: by step 200, the ranking of the factorial edits reverses under both RLOO and GRPO, while the real upgrades keep their order. When we vary the KL coefficient beta, the initial response does not depend on beta, and the response saturates below the KL equilibrium. In one experiment, the long-run response to a price rise is consistent with an additional implicit regularizer beta_0 of about 0.003 to 0.007.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
CytoWave: Perturbation-Centric Pretraining for Single-Cell Response Prediction
ScaleTraj: Scale-Decomposed Human Trajectory Generation
Improving Financial Cybersecurity Through Fraud Transaction Detection with Deep Learning
When Strong Reasoners Join the Pool: Small Union Premiums and Costly Runaway Generations in LLM Routing
A Capitulation Direction Emerges With Scale and Is Causally Load-Bearing Where Validation Is Strong: Eight Models, Two Families, and Five Measurement Hazards
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.