arXiv preprint ·
Reducing SNAP Payment Errors at Lower Cost With AI: A Simulation Study
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
New federal legislation will require states with high payment error rates in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to pay a share of benefit costs, potentially costing some states over a billion dollars per year. These costs create substantial pressure to improve payment accuracy. One strategy to improve payment accuracy is preauthorization review, in which staff double-check applications and correct mistakes before benefits are issued. But limited staff capacity makes it important to target these reviews effectively. One leading targeting approach uses statistical risk models to prioritize cases likely to contain errors. Another novel approach uses AI to flag specific potential discrepancies for reviewers to check. For states under pressure to reduce error rates, it is unclear which approach-or combination of approaches-would reduce payment error rates most effectively. We compare these strategies through simulations using public SNAP quality control data. Under our main assumptions, risk-based review alone costs about seven times as much as combining AI flags with risk scores. This cost advantage persists across a wide range of plausible assumptions. Our findings suggest that AI-assisted preauthorization review could be a key tool to help states avoid substantial cost-sharing obligations.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Hybrid Federated Learning for Multimodal Fusion under Missing Modalities and Site Heterogeneity
Integrating Machine Learning and Uncertainty Quantification for Real-Time Decision-Making in Digital Twins: A System-Centric Review and Perspective
Does Your Trial Simulator Know What the Drug Does? An Intervention-Blind Test of Interventional Validity on 7,207 Registered Trials
RATSIFT: Resolution-Adaptive Transformer for Solar Irradiance Forecasting and Temporal Downscaling
Exponential Seniority Weighting Chain-Ladder Reserving
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.