arXiv preprint ·
When Does Design Thinking Work? A Convergence Theorem for the Iterate-Test Core
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Design thinking is widely taught as an iterative loop of ideation, prototyping, and testing, yet conditions under which such a loop must improve innovation outcomes remain unspecified. Taking problem framing as given, we formalize the iterate-test core as search over a finite prototype space whose utility is learned through noisy evaluations. We prove that the prototype a team believes to be best converges almost surely to a local optimum under five conditions: finite framing, local ideation, non-summable discovery rates, unbiased repeated testing, and retention of tested prototypes. Bounded test bias or criteria drift degrades the guarantee by a bounded amount, and multiple stakeholders yield convergence to a locally Pareto-optimal set. Finite-horizon simulations across three landscape classes (additive valuation, NK rugged landscapes, and clustered modular architectures) show that asymptotic limits are rarely reached in practice. Teams face an optimizer's curse, overestimating their chosen concept by 4-8% and frequently discarding superior prototypes. Testing every prototype once proves to be the worst allocation; optimal performance requires building one to three prototypes per five tests and repeatedly re-testing leaders. Pre-screening concepts yields greater performance gains than tuning testing policies.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
CytoWave: Perturbation-Centric Pretraining for Single-Cell Response Prediction
ScaleTraj: Scale-Decomposed Human Trajectory Generation
Improving Financial Cybersecurity Through Fraud Transaction Detection with Deep Learning
When Strong Reasoners Join the Pool: Small Union Premiums and Costly Runaway Generations in LLM Routing
A Capitulation Direction Emerges With Scale and Is Causally Load-Bearing Where Validation Is Strong: Eight Models, Two Families, and Five Measurement Hazards
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.