arXiv preprint ·
LLMs and the Organization of Scientific Work
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The advent of large language models (LLMs) represents a technological revolution for science. Their diffusion may reshape not only how scientists conduct research, but also how they organize their work within teams. Here, we develop a conceptual framework in which LLMs expand individual capabilities across a range of research activities, reducing reliance on complementary human inputs within tasks and facilitating a more specialized division of labor among team members. We further propose that teams' history of collaboration may constrain their ability to reorganize in response to the new technological capabilities. Using CRediT contribution statements from approximately 120,000 PLOS ONE articles published between 2018 and 2025, we investigate changes in the division of labor within scientific teams following the release of ChatGPT in late 2022. We document three main findings. First, participation in scientific tasks falls below its previous trajectory, particularly in conceptualization, execution, and writing. Second, researchers become more specialized, exhibiting narrower task portfolios and less overlap in their contributions with co-authors. Third, these changes are concentrated among newly formed teams, whose members have no prior collaboration ties, whereas established teams, whose members have all collaborated previously, exhibit considerably greater organizational inertia. Our findings suggest that, in the wake of LLM diffusion, scientific work is being reorganized around greater individual autonomy and an increasingly specialized division of labor within teams.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Accessed, never disclosed: Silent access to protected health information by medical artificial intelligence agents
Swapping the Judge Changes the Ranking: A Preregistered Study of Cross-Provider Replication in LLM-Judged System Comparisons
Networked Synthetic Social Engineering on the Web
Palimpsestic Accountability in the US Federal AI Inventories
Time-Aware Urban Flood Routing with Sticky Edge Closure on Forecast Depth: A Hanoi Case Study
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.