arXiv preprint ·
IssueLighter: An Issue Type-Aware LLM Agent for Issue Report Validity Assessment
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Invalid issue reports are prevalent in open source software (OSS) projects, imposing substantial burdens on maintainers who already face a high risk of burnout. Prior research has primarily focused on identifying invalid reports for specific issue categories (e.g., bug and wontfix), leaving the broader landscape of OSS issue types largely unexplored and limiting the generalizability of existing approaches. Moreover, existing methods provide little support for explaining or validating their predictions, reducing their practical usefulness for maintainers. With the rise of LLM-based agents, it remains unclear whether a comprehensive understanding of the causes of invalidity across all issue types can improve validity assessment performance while producing well-grounded rationales. To this end, we first manually annotated the validity status of 520 issue reports from three OSS projects, i.e., pandas, scikit-learn, and mypy, resulting in 257 invalid reports and 263 valid ones. Then, we conducted a thematic analysis on these invalid reports and identified 13 causes of invalidity that are closely specific to issue types. Based on these insights, we propose IssueLighter, an agent-based framework with a type-aware validity assessment strategy that dynamically executes commands. Experimental results show that IssueLighter consistently and substantially outperforms all baseline methods, with an average F1 improvement of over 20 percentage points. Ablation studies confirm that both the type-aware strategy and the taxonomy of causes of invalidity contribute to the performance gains. Qualitative analysis further demonstrates that IssueLighter generates rationales grounded in accurately identified causes of invalidity and supported by evidence. Moreover, leveraging these rationales, we challenged maintainers' original decisions in four disputed cases, and all received approval.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
APG: Agentic Static-Analysis Infrastructure on LLVM-IR Graph Databases
Validation-Gated ML Pipeline Synthesis with Expert-Grounded Self-Evolving Skills
Toward an Evidence-Based Template for Agent Instruction Files: An Empirical Study of Adoption, Consistency, and Maintenance
Are We Just Applying LLMs? What SE Research Studies, Underexplores, and Could Do Next in the LLM Era
Fault-Free Profiles and Decision-Level Training for Root Cause Analysis via Small Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.