arXiv preprint ·
Human-Supervised Artificial Intelligence Researchers in Electric Power Systems: Knowledge, Physics, Simulation, and Governance for Large Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Keeping AI on the Power Grid
This review lays out a framework for using LLMs as assistants in power-system research while keeping human experts in charge of critical decisions. It also proposes a staged development roadmap and reporting requirements that make research claims, computations, and approvals easier to inspect.
What they found: The review examines LLM applications and scientific workflows in power-system research alongside physics-grounded power AI studies. It proposes a knowledge-physics-simulation-governance framework in which LLMs help translate information and coordinate tasks, while simulators and validation tools test models. Experts remain responsible for critical assumptions, safety boundaries, and final conclusions.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Conclusions in power-system research require a clear evidential basis. Researchers need to understand the data sources, modelling assumptions, and solution procedures to assess the conditions under which a conclusion holds. Large language models (LLMs) can help researchers extract information from documents and translate research requests into code and tool calls, but their outputs still require physical validation. Focusing on human-supervised artificial intelligence (AI) researchers, this review examines power-system LLM applications and related scientific workflows, together with physics-grounded power AI studies, to discuss the conditions for using LLMs in scientific research. In the proposed knowledge-physics-simulation-governance framework, LLMs translate information and coordinate tasks, simulators and validation tools test models, and experts retain authority over critical assumptions, safety boundaries, and final conclusions. Research processes should preserve materials for review so that claims can be traced to their sources, computations can be reproduced, and failed attempts and approvals can be examined. On this basis, a staged development roadmap and requirements for research reporting are proposed. Evaluation should focus on research artifacts and their validation to assess whether LLMs can improve the efficiency of power-system research within clearly defined permissions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Accessed, never disclosed: Silent access to protected health information by medical artificial intelligence agents
Swapping the Judge Changes the Ranking: A Preregistered Study of Cross-Provider Replication in LLM-Judged System Comparisons
Spatial Transfusion: From Structured Spatial Scene Understanding to Generation and Editing
The Agent Board: Kanban for Machines; Durable Coordination for Agents That Outlive the Conversation
LEANGUARD: Lean-Verified Guardrails for Tool-Using Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.