arXiv preprint ·

GeoGuesser Bench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Agents on Interactive Geolocation

Huanzhi Mao, Yichuan Wang, Michael Koo, Wenyuan Huang, Huy Doan, Jinghan Xia, Ziyao Wang and Joseph E. Gonzalez

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Artificial IntelligenceMachine Learning

Abstract

Vision-language model (VLM) agents that act in the open world need two abilities: world knowledge to interpret what they see, and exploration to find what they cannot yet see. We study how agents combine the two through interactive visual geolocation. GeoGuesser Bench contains 282 tasks in an offline Street View environment where agents rotate, zoom, and move between real panoramas. Its three task types shift the balance from knowledge to exploration: agents (1) report the coordinates of their starting location, (2) name the enclosing street, city, state, or country, or (3) find, read, and count nearby objects. The coordinate tasks in (1) also include 42 real GeoGuessr World Championship rounds, whose expert guesses provide a human reference. We evaluate 23 VLMs: the best accuracy is 62.5% on place naming and 35.0% on object finding, and the best agent averages 4352.4 GeoGuessr points on the championship rounds, against 4770.3 for the better expert in each round. Beyond these headline numbers, world knowledge and exploration are only weakly correlated across models: agents that localize well do not necessarily explore well. To understand where agents fail, we categorize their errors into vision, navigation, and tool-use failures. Further ablations show that the strongest agents, such as Claude Opus 4.8, still perform well with limited views, while weaker agents degrade; customizing the environment thus adjusts task difficulty. The environment's verifiable rewards and restorable state also support training, and our Planner-Worker-Compressor harness cuts planner tokens by 57-61% by compacting the interaction history. We hope GeoGuesser Bench and its environment serve as a high-quality foundation for simulating real-world exploration at scale.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Artificial Intelligence

Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics