arXiv preprint ·
Calibration-Constrained Diagnostics for Evaluating LLM Self-Evaluation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We introduce a reusable evaluation artifact for diagnosing whether LLM self-reported confidence can support confidence-gated act-or-defer decisions. The artifact is designed for evaluation rather than safety certification: it provides a black-box protocol, prompts, judge-reference labels, model outputs, reproduction scripts, and calibration-constrained diagnostic metrics for auditing LLM self-evaluation across math, factual, and commonsense reasoning tasks. Our central finding is that aggregate uncertainty summaries can produce deployment-misleading rankings: a model that appears strongest under standard aggregate calibration metrics can fail under category-level calibration constraints, while a model with worse aggregate calibration can exhibit stronger calibration-constrained behavior in the positive-margin region where high self-selection accuracy and tight calibration coexist. To expose this failure mode, we define PVC and C-PVC as category-level diagnostics over an accuracy-by-calibration surface: PVC counts categories whose self-evaluation accuracy exceeds a threshold, while C-PVC additionally requires category-level calibration error below a tolerance. We aggregate these diagnostics using Volume Under Surface (VUS) and a positive-margin restriction; they are VC/fat-shattering motivated but are empirical evaluation proxies, not literal VC-dimension estimates. Across 13 models and four benchmarks, the artifact shows weak confidence-correctness separation, stable diagnostic rankings under alternative categorizations and judge-label perturbations, and persistent positive-margin failures not captured by ECE or Brier score. Confidence-gated self-evaluation therefore requires calibration-constrained, category-level diagnostics, and we provide a reusable artifact for applying them under black-box access.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
A Self-Exploring and Self-Evolving Paradigm for Adaptive Edge AI Development
Accessed, never disclosed: Silent access to protected health information by medical artificial intelligence agents
Toward Executable Multi-framework Front-end Code Generation with Self-Correction
Spatial Transfusion: From Structured Spatial Scene Understanding to Generation and Editing
Learning by Doing: Autonomously Compiling and Curating Agent Skills from Verified Traces
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.