arXiv preprint ·
Retrain, Alert, or Rollback? A Three-Response Decision Framework for Production ML Under Concept Drift
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
When a deployed model degrades under concept drift, an operator can retrain it, raise an alert and monitor, or roll back. Yet most drift-adaptation methods consider only retraining. We present RAR (Retrain-Alert-Rollback), a state machine that gives each response an explicit trigger and cost. Retraining is gated on drift detection, label availability, and measured degradation. Every retrained model must pass a two-stage canary before promotion, and corruption-triggered and quality-triggered rollbacks enter different hold states. Under a prospectively specified protocol we compare RAR with six baselines, including a cost-aware retraining policy, on 13 streams: eight real public streams and five semi-synthetic streams derived from them. RAR does not dominate. At low retraining cost, retrain-heavy baselines lead, and no policy's rank differs significantly from RAR's. At higher cost, RAR beats detector-triggered retraining, periodic retraining, and no response simultaneously on four streams, each within a bounded cost window. Its advantage over detector-triggered retraining is consistent with a latency-feasibility condition stated in advance. Against the cost-aware policy, results are heterogeneous. RAR retrains before true drift onsets one eighth to one third as often as detector-triggered retraining, but at lower net utility on most semi-synthetic streams. On H2's designated corruption stream (a registered follow-up), rollbacks fire yet RAR loses to retraining baselines. At $ρ= 1$, removing the canary, and thus rollback, raises utility on 11 of 13 streams. On a post-hoc follow-up stream, cause-specific hold release resumes adaptation where a single cooldown does not. We provide the harness, configurations, and per-cell results for reproduction.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
A Self-Exploring and Self-Evolving Paradigm for Adaptive Edge AI Development
APG: Agentic Static-Analysis Infrastructure on LLVM-IR Graph Databases
Toward Executable Multi-framework Front-end Code Generation with Self-Correction
Toward an Evidence-Based Template for Agent Instruction Files: An Empirical Study of Adoption, Consistency, and Maintenance
CrossSWE: Benchmarking Cross-Repository Joint Development for Coding Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.