arXiv preprint ·
TIGER: Learning from Researcher Taste to Generate Tailored Research Ideas
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In pairwise comparisons where each judge chooses between an idea generated by its corresponding TIGER-8B policy and one generated by GPT-4.1, the three LLM researchers select the TIGER-8B idea in 56.6%-68.4% of 76 comparisons per researcher. PhD1 and PhD2 select the TIGER-8B idea in 19 of 30 pairs (63.3%) and 17 of 30 pairs (56.7%), respectively. All six directed cross-policy comparisons likewise favor the judge's matched TIGER-8B policy over an off-target policy, supporting the use of individual preference feedback for tailored research ideation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
A Self-Exploring and Self-Evolving Paradigm for Adaptive Edge AI Development
Accessed, never disclosed: Silent access to protected health information by medical artificial intelligence agents
Toward Executable Multi-framework Front-end Code Generation with Self-Correction
Spatial Transfusion: From Structured Spatial Scene Understanding to Generation and Editing
Learning by Doing: Autonomously Compiling and Curating Agent Skills from Verified Traces
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.