arXiv preprint ·
Do agents need to sleep?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLM-based agents, which increasingly operate persistently across sessions and accumulate memory through interaction, already exhibit the familiar symptoms of unchecked plasticity: semantic drift, degraded retrieval precision, propagation of stored errors, and saturation of memory capacity. Drawing on the selectionist "ringing, resonance and renormalization" (RRR) account of sleep, we propose that each of its three phases maps onto an operation feasible in digital memory architectures. Engineers building stateful agents, meanwhile, are independently rediscovering the problems sleep evolved to solve: what to forget, and when to do the forgetting. From this we derive the falsifiable prediction that selectionist consolidation will outperform instructionist alternatives as memory stores grow large. The core claim concerns the nature of continuous learning itself: plasticity has a price, and for any system that learns continuously under finite capacity while coupled to its environment, that price is sleep.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Neurons & Cognition
The (Butter)fly Dream: Linear Separability of World-Model Rollouts in a Connectome-Constrained Visual Model
Prior Action Control Causally Alters Language-Model Plasticity
AVID: A 5T fMRI Dataset for Benchmarking Auditory-induced Visual Mental Imagery Decoding
Modeling Visual Cortex with Layerwise Multiscale Manifold Capacity Maximization
When Model Complexity Matters in Cross-Subject Naturalistic fMRI Prediction
Get the few papers worth your time in Neurons & Cognition every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.