arXiv preprint ·
Switch-SWE: Do Coding Agents Hold Focus When Switching Between Unfinished Tasks?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Software development sessions often involve several unfinished tasks rather than one issue carried through to completion. As coding agents take on repository-level development, they need to recover an earlier task's requirements and partial progress after intervening work. Existing repository-level benchmarks typically score one issue-to-patch episode and do not directly measure whether an agent can resume a task after advancing other unfinished work in the same repository. We introduce \textbf{\ourmethod}, a benchmark for focus-task resumption in sessions that interleave unfinished tasks drawn from the same source repository, with a persistent checkout for each task. Each focus task is evaluated in matched uninterrupted and switched sessions with identical focus requirements and executable verifiers. The switched session interleaves ordered stages from other unfinished tasks in the same repository, while only the final focus patch is scored. \ourmethod~contains 200 focus tasks from 19 Python repositories, reconstructed from issue, pull-request, and review histories and rendered as 400 matched session specifications. Across 7 coding agents, interleaved unfinished work produces an average focus-task resolution gap of 11.5 percentage points, ranging from 6.0 to 15.0 percentage points. Trajectory analysis identifies cross-task requirement confusion and loss of task state as recurrent resumption behaviors. We introduce a plug-in context-management module that selects task-relevant history and maintains concise task-state summaries. On OpenCode, the module improves focus-task completion under same-repository task switching by 5.5 to 15.5 percentage points across the evaluated models. Code is available at github.com/Miraclecsc/Switch-SWE.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
XDecideBench: Evaluating Typed Decision Models and Confidence Policies Across Languages
GRIPS: An Empirical Study of Pre-SQL Grounding Information for SQL Generation
Information-Theoretic Design of Sparse Autoencoder-Based Steering
A Capitulation Direction Emerges With Scale and Is Causally Load-Bearing Where Validation Is Strong: Eight Models, Two Families, and Five Measurement Hazards
Learning by Doing: Autonomously Compiling and Curating Agent Skills from Verified Traces
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.