arXiv preprint ·
Yielding Fairness: Coupled Learning and Fairness for Value-Weighted Ranking
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Risk screening and recommendation systems pass or block accounts that generate both value and loss. Under a blocked-value budget, a cap on expected value forgone through blocking, the optimal ranking orders accounts by expected value per unit expected loss, a ratio of conditional expectations. This rule can conflict with accepted harm or net-harm criteria, blocking accounts that another criterion would pass at the same budget. We call these cases account-level objections and define group complaint disparity as the difference between groups' normalized realized objections. Weighted binary cross-entropy (W-BCE) implements the value-per-loss order with one score. Objection penalties modify the ranking, while group multipliers scale those penalties differently by group, tracing tradeoffs between loss capture and complaint disparity. This preserves the value-budgeted ranking structure and makes the cost of reducing contestable blocks explicit. Across public recommendation, insurance, credit, and mortgage datasets, we compare undamped W-BCE with ordinary BCE using yield Gini, an area summary of loss capture versus blocked value. Logarithmic weight damping is evaluated separately. Held-out evaluations measure capture-disparity tradeoffs. Validation-selected group-aware complaint penalties improve complaint closure in some cohorts. A corrected comparison normalizes and enlarges candidate policy banks using validation-only price sweeps and retains all ten applicable sources. The source-level results do not establish a statistically significant average advantage over group-blind pricing at the fixed minimum retained loss capture. We also compare with blocked-count, blocked-value, and protected-loss parity postprocessors, which do not directly constrain realized objections, and measure objections in candidate-count and loss units.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
State-Augmented Learning for Post-Deployment Adaptation of Coexisting O-RAN Applications
CytoWave: Perturbation-Centric Pretraining for Single-Cell Response Prediction
Information-Theoretic Design of Sparse Autoencoder-Based Steering
Improving Financial Cybersecurity Through Fraud Transaction Detection with Deep Learning
Toward Executable Multi-framework Front-end Code Generation with Self-Correction
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.