arXiv preprint ·
Abstention Spends Its Budget on Local Label Variance More Than on Novelty: Auditing Conformal Calibration and Selective Prediction under Molecular Scaffold Shift
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Selective prediction with split conformal calibration promises a post-hoc fix for molecular property prediction: abstain on the least reliable compounds, ideally out-of-distribution chemistry, and the retained set becomes trustworthy without retraining. We audit this recipe for a gradient-boosted fingerprint model on lipophilicity (regression) and BBBP (classification) under a Bemis-Murcko scaffold split, holding the fitted model and evaluation molecules fixed while varying only the calibration fold (18 replicates). (i) On lipophilicity, coverage depends on calibration provenance: calibrating on held-out training-scaffold molecules falls below nominal (PICP 0.841 at a 0.90 target), while novel-scaffold calibration recovers it (0.904); on BBBP, coverage stays above nominal in every regime. (ii) For split conformalized quantile regression (CQR) the conformal correction is a constant, so conformalization does not change what is abstained on. (iii) The abstention score (CQR width; effectively ensemble variance on BBBP) tracks local label variance more than chemical novelty: controlling for local label variance largely explains away the novelty association (partial Spearman 0.067 and 0.047). (iv) At a fixed assay budget, gating on interval width or ensemble variance never improves hit precision over ranking by point prediction, at the pre-specified operating point or across 20 exploratory settings; a plain novelty gate shows small, uncorrected gains at the smallest budgets. (v) In an exploratory analysis, exact conformal selection exceeds its false discovery rate target under training-scaffold calibration (0.303 at q=0.2) and is consistent with it under novel-scaffold calibration, contributing a data-driven batch size rather than a better ranking. Conformalization earns its keep through guarantees whose validity hinges on calibration provenance, not by choosing what to abstain on.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Variational learning of energy-stable macroscopic flow equations from microscopic laws
On Stochastic Continuous-Time Linear System Identification for Adaptive Stabilization
Transport for Conditional Sampling: Foundations and Applications
Efficient Proper Agnostic Learning of Halfspaces
Correctness and Predictive Uncertainty in Bayesian TSK Fuzzy Regression: A Reproducible Evaluation on Tabular and Building-Meter Data
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.