arXiv preprint ·
Renormalized Cellular Intelligence: When Does Model Reduction Preserve Collective Capability?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
As multi-agent systems grow in size and complexity, understanding which features of their interactions support collective capability becomes increasingly difficult. Can a simpler description preserve both task performance and the measured contribution of interactions between agents? Preserving collective dynamics alone is insufficient: reduction can alter decision-relevant information or give a non-communicating baseline access to pooled observations, distorting the measured advantage of interaction. We introduce Renormalized Cellular Intelligence (RCI), a framework for specifying and auditing capability preservation across scales. RCI treats the task, interacting dynamics, matched baseline, decision interfaces, and resource budget as a joint object of reduction. It specifies dynamical closure, decision compatibility, and preservation of the intended baseline comparison, and bounds the resulting error in relative capability gain. An exact analytical construction demonstrates task-score preservation, while a counterexample shows how closed reduced dynamics can erase the measured interaction gain. Using cellular systems as models of locally interacting agents, we evaluate three reduction candidates on five frozen learned models without retraining. The final candidate reduces the evolving state from eight to five dimensions per cell (37.5%). Within-run uncertainty bounds support relative gain above a prespecified threshold for the fixed model collection, yet the candidate fails the closure and decision-preservation requirements for a complete RCI certificate. RCI provides explicit criteria for distinguishing positive interaction gains from
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Multiagent Systems
Scientific Liquidity Agents: An Agent-Based Model of Knowledge Arbitrage in Scientific Communities
CONFIRM: Governing Scientific Reporting for Trustworthy Agentic Neuroimaging
Organizational Learning in Materials Discovery Campaigns: Which Databases, Calculations, and Agent Teams Pay Off
MAC-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Collaboration via Interconnected Tasks
Coati: Host-Grounded Execution for Installable Mobile GUI Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Multiagent Systems every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.