arXiv preprint ·

Inference First, Training Underneath: Layer-Granular LoRA Co-Serving with LayerLoom

Zongpu Zhang, Yishu Yin and Xuehai Qian

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine Learning

Abstract

Serving and fine-tuning a large language model on the same GPUs can turn the idle capacity between inference bursts into training progress, and low-rank adaptation (LoRA) makes this co-location cheap because both workloads read a single frozen copy of the base weights. The difficulty lies in the fine-tuning backward pass, which has no counterpart in inference. Current co-serving systems schedule backward work per serving iteration: each iteration carries a fixed backward budget, and requests that arrive in the meantime wait for it to finish, so fine-tuning dictates inference latency whenever load spikes. We observe that the backward pass of a LoRA microbatch decomposes into per-layer tasks over the same weights that the inference forward pass visits, which allows backward work to be scheduled at layer rather than iteration granularity. Building on this observation, LayerLoom attaches same-layer backward tasks to the inference forward pass and, at each layer, runs only as many of them as the latency slack of in-flight requests permits. To keep a ready task at every layer, LayerLoom maintains a wavefront of fine-tuning microbatches staggered across layers, and it bounds the wavefront's activation memory by offloading microbatch state to host memory and prefetching it ahead of the layer where the scheduler plans to use it. A fused kernel serves the paired forward and backward GEMMs from a single read of each base weight. Because all backward work of an iteration finishes within its forward pass, new requests join the next iteration as in continuous batching. On an RTX 4090 GPU running Llama-3.1-8B under a bursty production trace, LayerLoom raises joint SLO attainment by 13.5-21.8 points over prior works with fine-tuning throughput that is comparable or up to 12% higher, and it reaches the same training losses.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics