arXiv preprint ·
Multi-Estimate Elicitation Does Not Uniformly Debias Language Model Judgments
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Does eliciting five weighted estimates within a single response consistently improve numerical judgments? We compare direct and multi-estimate elicitation across anchoring, hindsight, base-rate, conjunction, and status-quo/default tasks in six frozen configurations. Each configuration contributes 618 admitted development units and 3,702 admitted formal units; the six-configuration formal cohort contains 22,212 units, including 21 missing outcomes. Of 45 preregistered confirmatory tests across five configurations, 12 reject on complete cases and 11 retain directional confirmation after the prespecified missingness-protection rule. Only one adjusted bound exceeds its smallest effect size of interest: gpt-oss-120b shows a 10.68-percentage-point increase in post-outcome confirmation error under multi-estimate elicitation (worst-case estimate 10.04 points). The remaining ten retained effects have sub-threshold point estimates; non-rejection does not establish equivalence. Joint presentation lowers signed conjunction excess in four confirmatory configurations, but this comparison changes both constraint visibility and call structure. Flash-high combines two disjoint execution-window batches under an approved continuation protocol, preserving their identities and non-causal interpretation. Post-hoc candidate-spread associations across all six configurations remain in-sample and require independent predictive validation. The completed cohort provides no evidence for uniform debiasing by multi-estimate elicitation. Materials: https://github.com/asj252/llm-judgment-studies
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Spotting the Artificial: Dialogic Humor Improvisation in Humans and LLMs
XDecideBench: Evaluating Typed Decision Models and Confidence Policies Across Languages
Swap, Replicate, Read the Mass: A Protocol for Auditing Demographic Bias in System One Decision Models
Information-Theoretic Design of Sparse Autoencoder-Based Steering
Robustness Starts with the Objective: Designing and Certifying Robust LLM-Generated Heuristics
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.