arXiv preprint ·

Quantiles, Not Points: Streaming Quantile Matching for Ordinal-Aware LLM-as-a-Judge Calibration

Ilija Subasic, Andrew Rabinovich and Zhao Chen

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Artificial IntelligenceComputation & Language / NLP

Abstract

LLM-as-a-judge scores are often distributionally shifted from human ratings on any given evaluation task, and post-hoc calibration (mapping LLM to human scores in a small labeled anchor set) has become a popular method to correct for this shift. In this paper we derive the calibration from two positions: that LLMaJ scores are ordinal ratings drawn from a distribution rather than isolated points. We present streaming quantile matching (SQM), a version of a classical method not previously bench marked for LLMaJ calibration, which is built on the two positions by computing the optimal-transport map between the LLM and human score distributions. We develop an evaluation framework and within it we show that unlike point-wise calibrations, SQM respects the ordinality of the human anchor set and achieves the best distributional fidelity and the top overall rank across models and data. We also show that in general, post-hoc calibration narrows the raw error gap between smaller and larger judge models, which opens the possibility of more efficient LLM judges.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Artificial Intelligence

Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics