arXiv preprint ·

SPARK: Self-Correcting Embodied Memory via Physical Re-Observation

Dmytro Kurdydyk, Aadi Palnitkar, Sebastian Scherer and Seungchan Kim

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
RoboticsArtificial IntelligenceComputation & Language / NLPMachine Learning

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems have seen growing adoption in embodied settings as language-queryable memories of the environment. However, existing approaches often assume a reliable single-episode knowledge base (KB) or accumulate observations across episodes without correcting prior errors. Such errors can persist through incorrect semantic labels, inaccurate object positions, and inconsistent spatial relationships. To address this, we present SPARK, a corrective multi-episode framework for embodied RAG. After the first episode, a semantic critic flags regions of the KB, a targeted planner generates revisits, and a selective merge adds, removes, or replaces KB information based on the new observations. We evaluate SPARK on four outdoor AirSim maps under two degraded viewpoint conditions, using perception-built KBs, a visibility-constrained oracle used only for evaluation, and a fixed set of 158 embodied question answering (EQA) questions scored before and after correction. A single corrective episode improves downstream EQA on every map under both conditions while storing 13-41% fewer objects than append-only updating, with gains up to 2.7x on one map-condition pair. Extending correction through Episode 4 brings every map above the EQA performance of its undegraded reference. Ablations show that the critic's three signals each contribute to performance, that targeted revisits achieve a larger mean gain than untargeted ones under the same budget, and that selective merging achieves gains comparable to append-only updating with a smaller KB. Overall, SPARK demonstrates the value of correcting embodied memory through targeted re-observation, particularly as embodied systems scale and the risk of accumulated errors increases.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Robotics

Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics